Discussion about this post

User's avatar
elba's avatar

Spot on, Julian. As you know we're on the same page...except for your eternal optimism.

*A ban on all fossil fuels, which are the main source of toxic chemicals and their replacement with nontoxic renewables. [ will never happen]

and

*An international body (like the IPCC) to measure and document the chemical tsunami and its effects on human and environmental health. [Like the UN? Did you watch Geneva?}

Tristan Sykes's avatar

Indeed, the threat of toxic overload is incredibly under-researched and utterly terrifying. Unfortunately, at this late stage, the amount of human-made 'stuff' now exceeds the living biomass of the planet. Even were we to entirely stop producing new toxic products, the breakdown of already existing products is a dreadful planetary legacy which will likely live on long after its inventors have become extinct.

Rapidly accelerating sperm-decline on its own, appears enough on its own to assure functional extinction by 2040. Other carcinogenic and endocrine disrupting toxic effects will assuredly assist this process.

For those who haven't read the 'Temporal Trends in Sperm Count' paper, I refer it to you, particularly highlighting this piece of text - "The slope for SC among unselected men was steeper in a model restricted to post-2000 data (–1.73: –3.23 to –0.24; P = 0.024) and the percent decline per year doubled, increasing from 1.16% post-1972 to 2.64% post-2000. Results were similar for TSC, with a 62.3% overall decline among unselected men (–4.70 million/year; –6.56 to –2.83; P < 0.001) in the adjusted meta-regression model. All results changed only minimally in multiple sensitivity analyses." https://academic.oup.com/humupd/article/29/2/157/6824414

Simply put, global sperm count in human males is rapidly accelerating towards zero and at the current rate, will become entirely infertile well before 2040.

Not only has collapse of natural and human systems become inevitable, but extinction also.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?