Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sean's avatar
Jan 14Edited

Funny, I was digging into similar aligned sources just this week. Many by William Ophuls and thinkers like him. Some ideas that got my attention in no particular order, merely grist for the mill. May parts be helpful to someone.

I wish there were a solution but there isn’t. Solutions are for problems not predicaments. Art Berman

“Civilizations are unnatural accumulations of wealth and power that cannot be sustained over the long term. Insuperable biophysical limits combine with innate human fallibility to precipitate eventual collapse.”

The author’s solution to a civilization’s collapse — absent moderation — is to 1) recognize that the “deep structural problems” have no solutions and 2) preserve as much as possible to avoid losing knowledge, tools, etc. to history.

“Wise men say, and not without reason, that whoever wishes to foresee the future must consult the past; for human events ever resemble those of preceding times. This arises from the fact that they are produced by men who ever have been, and ever will be, animated by the same passions, and thus they necessarily have the same results.” — Niccolò Machiavelli

“One way of restating the Second Law, often called the entropy law, is to say that matter-energy transformations cannot be reversed; time’s arrow flies in only one direction… In short, over time energy moves inexorably downhill from a more useful or concentrated state to one that is less useful or concentrated. This movement is called entropy.”

Immoderate Greatness = hubris. Civilizations rise and fall because human nature — hubris — fails to let them see the flaws in their own system. One of the greatest traps of all is fanaticism: refusing to reconsider the values and goals of the system, even though they have now become perverse or even disastrous.

The core failure everyone is skating around is this: climate mitigation treats a living, historical, relational Earth as if it were a controllable machine — and mistakes abstractions for reality.

Carbon budgets are not the villain. They are symptoms of a deeper refusal: to accept irreversibility, to accept inheritance, to accept that the scale and power of civilization itself are the problem. That’s why techno-fixes proliferate, limits are endlessly deferred, and language becomes euphemistic and circular.

All the debate about energy requirements, efficiencies, or LULUCF ratios is still operating inside the machine metaphor: inputs, outputs, efficiencies, substitutions. As Whitehead would say, they are mistaking abstractions for concrete reality.

To put it sharply: you cannot budget the future of a system whose governing dynamics change as a function of its past. That is the dagger cutting through all these circular debates.

My analysis suggests that there is very little that we can do. Most of the trends I identify are inexorable, and complex adaptive systems are ultimately unmanageable. The city is an ecological parasite.

In short, because energy is the sine qua non of complexity, anything that diminishes the quantity, quality, or efficiency of energy threatens a complex civilization’s survival.

In short, limited, fallible human beings are bound to bungle the job of managing complex systems. What they can neither understand nor predict, they cannot expect to control, so failure is inevitable at some point.

This appeal to prudence will not be readily accepted. For the hubris of every civilization is that it is, like the Titanic, unsinkable. Hence the motivation to plan for shipwreck is lacking.

Modern civilization is therefore bound for a worse fate than the Titanic. When it sinks, the lifeboats, if any, will be ill provisioned, and no one will come to its rescue. Humanity will undoubtedly survive. Civilization as we know it will not.

Paradoxically, therefore, those who are accustomed to a simple life without modern conveniences and who win their subsistence locally and directly from the Earth may be better positioned not only to survive the crisis but also to reconstruct their societies along the lines envisioned by Schumacher and Illich.

The Six Nations Confederacy had it all sussed out long before Pocahontas' days. But then Britain, France and America happened. So their very civilized and sustainable world longer exists and is no longer possible. Their ecological life sustaining rich domain has been destroyed.

I hope that cheers you up.

Martin White's avatar

Shouting hopeyim unyo the void again, Julian?

I thought for awhile you were coming over to the dark side like William Rees has lately, but I think you are just more congenitally sunny- minded about humanity.

Earth Citoyens are good-hearted people with collapse awareness, but they fail to have basic sociological awareness.

The corporations own everything, as I seem tediously say all the time, with no pundits willing to face that brute truth. Corporations are predatory ultrasocial powers that organize to protect and promote their interests above all else,

Statistics and warnings about ecocide leading to extinction mean nothing to them.

29 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?